Skip to main content

Clarence Darrow for the Defense

Clarence Darrow was most prominent American lawyer around end of nineteenth and beginning of twentieth century. Irving Stone has written his excellent biography ' Clarence Darrow for the Defense'. 
This post and some next following posts of the LegalTrek series are about Clarence Darrow and his biography.

Clarence Darrow was born on 18th April, 1857, about half a century before Leibowitz, about whom some posts have already been published. Darrow was most famous lawyer of his time and his life is excellently documented by Irving Stone in the book 'Clarence Darrow for the Defense'. It should be read by everyone, who aspires to become a lawyer.

Darrow was intellectual liberal, whose sympathies lay with the underdogs -  poor, labourers,  African Americans. He also taught at Illinois college of Law. Once his student asked him if it was possible to be financially successful lawyer, without resorting to sharp tactics, or taking advantage of technicality of law, or injuring the other fellow.
'No', answered Darrow, without any hesitation.
The student said then how come Darrow was successful and earned great deal of money, if he was not crooked.
Darrow explained that it is said that he was successful lawyer but he was not financially successful. His clients were not rich; they were downtrodden.

When Darrow was old, he once debated to take up a case or not, as it involved lot of time and a lot of travelling expenses. He asked if the client had money to pay. He was told that the client had no money to pay.
'This settles the question', answered Darrow. 'I will take up the case.' He paid the money from his pocket.

One third to half of Darrow's professional efforts were devoted to the clients from whom he collected nothing. He devoted more time to widows and orphans than all lawyers in Chicago put together. 

Darrow was liberal and known for his wit. He could marshal facts better than anyone else. He had phenomenal memory and summed up his cases from his memory, without referring to the notes. This made him one of the most famous American lawyer and civil libertarian.

In the next few posts, we will talk about some cases contested by him.

#LegalTrek #YatindraSingh 
Irving Stone, Clarence Darrow, Clarence Darrow for the Defense,


Popular posts from this blog


Two areas are close to my heart, namely uniform civil code and population control. I had drafted bills in late 1990's before I was  offered judgeship. The bills were distributed in the Parliament at that time but before they could be introduced (whether as a bill from the public or as a private member bill) the Parliament was dissolved. 
The Central government has asked the Law Commission to examine the issue of implementing the  Uniform Civil Code in detail and submit a report. I thought of publishing the bill relating to Uniform Civil Code that I had drafted.


Sometime ago, there were headlines in the newspaper 'Night Drama that did not succeed'. Here is the story of a night drama that succeeded. 
Kalyan Singh was the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and Romesh Bhandari was the Governor. He,  illegally dismissed the Kalyan Singh Government on 21st February, 1998.  A writ petition was filed the smae night and he was reinstated. This is the only time that the a deposed head of a State was pput back in saddle by the court. Here is the account of the same. 
The writ petition at the Allahabad High Court was filed by Dr. NKS Gaur, an MLA from Allahabad North and Minister of Higher Education in UP, but for the sake of convenience, the case is referred as 'the Kalyan-Singh case'.  
During my tenure as a judge, it has been matter of speculation/ complaint how I became Additional Advocate General and why was this case entrusted to me. This is explained in Appendix-I to this article. In order to complete the picture, Romesh Bhandari's …


Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees right to the life and liberty. Right to move to the court to enforce Article 21 was suspended under Article 359 of the Constitution during internal emergency (1975-77). Soon a question arose if, in such a situation, a writ of Habeas Corpus is maintainable? ADM Jabalpur Vs Shiv Kant Shukla AIR 1976 SC 1207 : (1976)2 scc 521: 1976 UJ (SC) 610: 1976 Cr LR (SC) 303: 1976 CrL J 1945 (SC) (the Habeas Corpus case) dealt with this question. This article, written 20 years after the aforesaid case was decided, narrates about the incidents, lawyers and judges connected with that case and what has happened to them.
‘The time has come’ The Walrus said ‘To talk of many things:
Of shoes and ships and sealing wax-
Of cabbages - and kings-
And why the sea is boiling hot-
And whether pigs have wings’ Through the Looking Glass; Lewis Carroll